<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Design Review 2010 Released and Supporting PDF’s</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thecadgeek.com/blog/2009/03/design-review-2010-released-and-supporting-pdfs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thecadgeek.com/blog/2009/03/design-review-2010-released-and-supporting-pdfs/</link>
	<description>By: Donnie Gladfelter</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 11:28:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>	<item>
		<title>By: Donnie Gladfelter</title>
		<link>http://thecadgeek.com/blog/2009/03/design-review-2010-released-and-supporting-pdfs/comment-page-1/#comment-2849</link>
		<dc:creator>Donnie Gladfelter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 20:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecadgeek.com/blog/2009/03/30/design-review-2010-released-and-supporting-pdfs/#comment-2849</guid>
		<description>@dswinson As I understand it the RML format is a &quot;red mark&quot; file from the old Volo View, and only contains the markups (not the DWG itself).  Nonetheless, I&#039;m not sure Design Review can open this.  I did find the following discussion board post on the topic.  Specifically, have a look at Scott Sheppard&#039;s reply. 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://discussion.autodesk.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=370356&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://discussion.autodesk.com/forums/thread.jspa...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@dswinson As I understand it the RML format is a &quot;red mark&quot; file from the old Volo View, and only contains the markups (not the DWG itself).  Nonetheless, I&#039;m not sure Design Review can open this.  I did find the following discussion board post on the topic.  Specifically, have a look at Scott Sheppard&#039;s reply.<br />
<a href="http://discussion.autodesk.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=370356" target="_blank"></a><a href="http://discussion.autodesk.com/forums/thread.jspa" rel="nofollow">http://discussion.autodesk.com/forums/thread.jspa</a>&#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donnie Gladfelter</title>
		<link>http://thecadgeek.com/blog/2009/03/design-review-2010-released-and-supporting-pdfs/comment-page-1/#comment-4192</link>
		<dc:creator>Donnie Gladfelter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 20:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecadgeek.com/blog/2009/03/30/design-review-2010-released-and-supporting-pdfs/#comment-4192</guid>
		<description>@dswinson As I understand it the RML format is a &quot;red mark&quot; file from the old Volo View, and only contains the markups (not the DWG itself).  Nonetheless, I&#039;m not sure Design Review can open this.  I did find the following discussion board post on the topic.  Specifically, have a look at Scott Sheppard&#039;s reply. 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://discussion.autodesk.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=370356&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://discussion.autodesk.com/forums/thread.jspa...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@dswinson As I understand it the RML format is a &quot;red mark&quot; file from the old Volo View, and only contains the markups (not the DWG itself).  Nonetheless, I&#039;m not sure Design Review can open this.  I did find the following discussion board post on the topic.  Specifically, have a look at Scott Sheppard&#039;s reply.<br />
<a href="http://discussion.autodesk.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=370356" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://discussion.autodesk.com/forums/thread.jspa" rel="nofollow">http://discussion.autodesk.com/forums/thread.jspa</a>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dswinson</title>
		<link>http://thecadgeek.com/blog/2009/03/design-review-2010-released-and-supporting-pdfs/comment-page-1/#comment-2846</link>
		<dc:creator>dswinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 11:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecadgeek.com/blog/2009/03/30/design-review-2010-released-and-supporting-pdfs/#comment-2846</guid>
		<description>Hi, I have had a problem with downloading the new software. DesignReview 2008 was working fine. Used it today. I got  file today with an .rml format, so I downloaded the new DesignReview 2010. Downloaded once. Crashed (on opening) with error message which I sent to AutoDesk. Unloaded software, then reinstalled. Same again. Hoping to get some email feed back from AutoDesk. 
If anybody has some helpful feedback or suggestions that would be great. Is their a patch? Any known incompatibilities? Thanks David </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I have had a problem with downloading the new software. DesignReview 2008 was working fine. Used it today. I got  file today with an .rml format, so I downloaded the new DesignReview 2010. Downloaded once. Crashed (on opening) with error message which I sent to AutoDesk. Unloaded software, then reinstalled. Same again. Hoping to get some email feed back from AutoDesk.<br />
If anybody has some helpful feedback or suggestions that would be great. Is their a patch? Any known incompatibilities? Thanks David </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dswinson</title>
		<link>http://thecadgeek.com/blog/2009/03/design-review-2010-released-and-supporting-pdfs/comment-page-1/#comment-4191</link>
		<dc:creator>dswinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 11:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecadgeek.com/blog/2009/03/30/design-review-2010-released-and-supporting-pdfs/#comment-4191</guid>
		<description>Hi, I have had a problem with downloading the new software. DesignReview 2008 was working fine. Used it today. I got  file today with an .rml format, so I downloaded the new DesignReview 2010. Downloaded once. Crashed (on opening) with error message which I sent to AutoDesk. Unloaded software, then reinstalled. Same again. Hoping to get some email feed back from AutoDesk. 
If anybody has some helpful feedback or suggestions that would be great. Is their a patch? Any known incompatibilities? Thanks David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I have had a problem with downloading the new software. DesignReview 2008 was working fine. Used it today. I got  file today with an .rml format, so I downloaded the new DesignReview 2010. Downloaded once. Crashed (on opening) with error message which I sent to AutoDesk. Unloaded software, then reinstalled. Same again. Hoping to get some email feed back from AutoDesk.<br />
If anybody has some helpful feedback or suggestions that would be great. Is their a patch? Any known incompatibilities? Thanks David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

