<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Engineered Efficiency offers Unlimited Live Training</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thecadgeek.com/blog/2008/06/engineered-efficiency-offers-unlimited-live-training/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thecadgeek.com/blog/2008/06/engineered-efficiency-offers-unlimited-live-training/</link>
	<description>By: Donnie Gladfelter</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 01:10:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Call</title>
		<link>http://thecadgeek.com/blog/2008/06/engineered-efficiency-offers-unlimited-live-training/comment-page-1/#comment-3021</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Call</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 12:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecadgeek.com/blog/2008/06/16/engineered-efficiency-offers-unlimited-free-training/#comment-3021</guid>
		<description>Thanks a lot for this useful post. But I had trouble navigating through your web site because I kept getting 502 bad gateway error. Just thought to let you know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks a lot for this useful post. But I had trouble navigating through your web site because I kept getting 502 bad gateway error. Just thought to let you know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Call</title>
		<link>http://thecadgeek.com/blog/2008/06/engineered-efficiency-offers-unlimited-live-training/comment-page-1/#comment-4082</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Call</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 12:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecadgeek.com/blog/2008/06/16/engineered-efficiency-offers-unlimited-free-training/#comment-4082</guid>
		<description>Thanks a lot for this useful post. But I had trouble navigating through your web site because I kept getting 502 bad gateway error. Just thought to let you know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks a lot for this useful post. But I had trouble navigating through your web site because I kept getting 502 bad gateway error. Just thought to let you know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Revit Architecture India &#187; Great offers for the Unemployed</title>
		<link>http://thecadgeek.com/blog/2008/06/engineered-efficiency-offers-unlimited-live-training/comment-page-1/#comment-2458</link>
		<dc:creator>Revit Architecture India &#187; Great offers for the Unemployed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 06:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecadgeek.com/blog/2008/06/16/engineered-efficiency-offers-unlimited-free-training/#comment-2458</guid>
		<description>[...] Engineered Efficiency offers Unlimited Live&#160;Training [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Engineered Efficiency offers Unlimited Live&nbsp;Training [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Benton</title>
		<link>http://thecadgeek.com/blog/2008/06/engineered-efficiency-offers-unlimited-live-training/comment-page-1/#comment-1682</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Benton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 13:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecadgeek.com/blog/2008/06/16/engineered-efficiency-offers-unlimited-free-training/#comment-1682</guid>
		<description>Donnie-you are absolutely correct.  It is much easier, and cheaper, to hire people and then let them go when a problem comes up.  With a software, you are stuck with it.  The only way out is to purchase new software.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Donnie-you are absolutely correct.  It is much easier, and cheaper, to hire people and then let them go when a problem comes up.  With a software, you are stuck with it.  The only way out is to purchase new software.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Benton</title>
		<link>http://thecadgeek.com/blog/2008/06/engineered-efficiency-offers-unlimited-live-training/comment-page-1/#comment-4081</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Benton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 13:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecadgeek.com/blog/2008/06/16/engineered-efficiency-offers-unlimited-free-training/#comment-4081</guid>
		<description>Donnie-you are absolutely correct.  It is much easier, and cheaper, to hire people and then let them go when a problem comes up.  With a software, you are stuck with it.  The only way out is to purchase new software.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Donnie-you are absolutely correct.  It is much easier, and cheaper, to hire people and then let them go when a problem comes up.  With a software, you are stuck with it.  The only way out is to purchase new software.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Convincing Management to Upgrade &#124; The CAD Geek Blog</title>
		<link>http://thecadgeek.com/blog/2008/06/engineered-efficiency-offers-unlimited-live-training/comment-page-1/#comment-1677</link>
		<dc:creator>Convincing Management to Upgrade &#124; The CAD Geek Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 04:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecadgeek.com/blog/2008/06/16/engineered-efficiency-offers-unlimited-free-training/#comment-1677</guid>
		<description>[...] Benton of CAD-a-Blog recently commented on my last post Engineered Efficiency offers Unlimited Live Training, telling a story I hear all [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Benton of CAD-a-Blog recently commented on my last post Engineered Efficiency offers Unlimited Live Training, telling a story I hear all [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donnie Gladfelter</title>
		<link>http://thecadgeek.com/blog/2008/06/engineered-efficiency-offers-unlimited-live-training/comment-page-1/#comment-1663</link>
		<dc:creator>Donnie Gladfelter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 18:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecadgeek.com/blog/2008/06/16/engineered-efficiency-offers-unlimited-free-training/#comment-1663</guid>
		<description>Brian - Personally I think it comes to be a matter of predictability.  When a manager looks at a purchase request for technology they have little assurance that the company will ever recover the costs.  On the other hand, a manager can simply hire another person, and by means of job performance goals and the like - measure his/her performance over time to insure an adequate ROI.  Knowing the benefits of C3D vs hiring another person seems ridiculous, but for a manager who knows people but not technology - that new guy seems more responsible from a financial perspective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian &#8211; Personally I think it comes to be a matter of predictability.  When a manager looks at a purchase request for technology they have little assurance that the company will ever recover the costs.  On the other hand, a manager can simply hire another person, and by means of job performance goals and the like &#8211; measure his/her performance over time to insure an adequate ROI.  Knowing the benefits of C3D vs hiring another person seems ridiculous, but for a manager who knows people but not technology &#8211; that new guy seems more responsible from a financial perspective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donnie Gladfelter</title>
		<link>http://thecadgeek.com/blog/2008/06/engineered-efficiency-offers-unlimited-live-training/comment-page-1/#comment-4080</link>
		<dc:creator>Donnie Gladfelter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 18:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecadgeek.com/blog/2008/06/16/engineered-efficiency-offers-unlimited-free-training/#comment-4080</guid>
		<description>Brian - Personally I think it comes to be a matter of predictability.  When a manager looks at a purchase request for technology they have little assurance that the company will ever recover the costs.  On the other hand, a manager can simply hire another person, and by means of job performance goals and the like - measure his/her performance over time to insure an adequate ROI.  Knowing the benefits of C3D vs hiring another person seems ridiculous, but for a manager who knows people but not technology - that new guy seems more responsible from a financial perspective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian &#8211; Personally I think it comes to be a matter of predictability.  When a manager looks at a purchase request for technology they have little assurance that the company will ever recover the costs.  On the other hand, a manager can simply hire another person, and by means of job performance goals and the like &#8211; measure his/her performance over time to insure an adequate ROI.  Knowing the benefits of C3D vs hiring another person seems ridiculous, but for a manager who knows people but not technology &#8211; that new guy seems more responsible from a financial perspective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Benton</title>
		<link>http://thecadgeek.com/blog/2008/06/engineered-efficiency-offers-unlimited-live-training/comment-page-1/#comment-1662</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Benton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecadgeek.com/blog/2008/06/16/engineered-efficiency-offers-unlimited-free-training/#comment-1662</guid>
		<description>Great post Donnie.  You hit on many points that I am currently dealing with where I work.  Be bought Civil3D 2007, 2 years ago, and have yet to do anything with it.  We did upgrade from AutoCAD 2004 to 2007, then to 2008.  Now we are debating running 2009.  But we run C3D as vanilla AutoCAD, with tons of custom lisp routines.  Some of our surveyors are using Civil3D to manage points, but that&#039;s the extent.  Management is worried about the bottom line.  We had our vendor come in and train us, but that was in October 2007.  The market is slow right now for us and they are worried about, as you said, fixing something that isn&#039;t broken.  I understand this thinking to an extent, but if we already bought the software, bought the training, then why aren&#039;t we using it?  I told my boss yesterday that I have come to the realization in my life that there are two things I will never understand; women (no offense I&#039;m just dumb) and management.  Neither he nor my wife appreciated that comment.  Another thing I haven&#039;t learned is to keep my mouth shut!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post Donnie.  You hit on many points that I am currently dealing with where I work.  Be bought Civil3D 2007, 2 years ago, and have yet to do anything with it.  We did upgrade from AutoCAD 2004 to 2007, then to 2008.  Now we are debating running 2009.  But we run C3D as vanilla AutoCAD, with tons of custom lisp routines.  Some of our surveyors are using Civil3D to manage points, but that&#8217;s the extent.  Management is worried about the bottom line.  We had our vendor come in and train us, but that was in October 2007.  The market is slow right now for us and they are worried about, as you said, fixing something that isn&#8217;t broken.  I understand this thinking to an extent, but if we already bought the software, bought the training, then why aren&#8217;t we using it?  I told my boss yesterday that I have come to the realization in my life that there are two things I will never understand; women (no offense I&#8217;m just dumb) and management.  Neither he nor my wife appreciated that comment.  Another thing I haven&#8217;t learned is to keep my mouth shut!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Benton</title>
		<link>http://thecadgeek.com/blog/2008/06/engineered-efficiency-offers-unlimited-live-training/comment-page-1/#comment-4079</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Benton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecadgeek.com/blog/2008/06/16/engineered-efficiency-offers-unlimited-free-training/#comment-4079</guid>
		<description>Great post Donnie.  You hit on many points that I am currently dealing with where I work.  Be bought Civil3D 2007, 2 years ago, and have yet to do anything with it.  We did upgrade from AutoCAD 2004 to 2007, then to 2008.  Now we are debating running 2009.  But we run C3D as vanilla AutoCAD, with tons of custom lisp routines.  Some of our surveyors are using Civil3D to manage points, but that&#039;s the extent.  Management is worried about the bottom line.  We had our vendor come in and train us, but that was in October 2007.  The market is slow right now for us and they are worried about, as you said, fixing something that isn&#039;t broken.  I understand this thinking to an extent, but if we already bought the software, bought the training, then why aren&#039;t we using it?  I told my boss yesterday that I have come to the realization in my life that there are two things I will never understand; women (no offense I&#039;m just dumb) and management.  Neither he nor my wife appreciated that comment.  Another thing I haven&#039;t learned is to keep my mouth shut!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post Donnie.  You hit on many points that I am currently dealing with where I work.  Be bought Civil3D 2007, 2 years ago, and have yet to do anything with it.  We did upgrade from AutoCAD 2004 to 2007, then to 2008.  Now we are debating running 2009.  But we run C3D as vanilla AutoCAD, with tons of custom lisp routines.  Some of our surveyors are using Civil3D to manage points, but that&#8217;s the extent.  Management is worried about the bottom line.  We had our vendor come in and train us, but that was in October 2007.  The market is slow right now for us and they are worried about, as you said, fixing something that isn&#8217;t broken.  I understand this thinking to an extent, but if we already bought the software, bought the training, then why aren&#8217;t we using it?  I told my boss yesterday that I have come to the realization in my life that there are two things I will never understand; women (no offense I&#8217;m just dumb) and management.  Neither he nor my wife appreciated that comment.  Another thing I haven&#8217;t learned is to keep my mouth shut!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

