<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Starting a CAD Standard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thecadgeek.com/blog/2007/10/starting-a-cad-standard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thecadgeek.com/blog/2007/10/starting-a-cad-standard/</link>
	<description>By: Donnie Gladfelter</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 23:36:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>	<item>
		<title>By: Donnie Gladfelter</title>
		<link>http://thecadgeek.com/blog/2007/10/starting-a-cad-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-976</link>
		<dc:creator>Donnie Gladfelter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 20:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecadgeek.com/blog/2007/10/28/starting-a-cad-standard/#comment-976</guid>
		<description>Your typical CAD user will quickly voice their complaints about a standard, but rarely praise it.  It&#039;s the thankless job of CAD management.  Towards the end of last year my company rolled out a new layer standard.  To shed some light on the dynamic of my company, we are divided into sectors (ie residential, site development) and our sectors are then divided into groups.  In all we have some 20-30 different engineering groups in my company.

At the start of our layer standardization process we had some 20 mini-standards.  After some 6-9 months in development, we combined those many standards into 1.  The result has been a roll-out that has been rather successful.  Granted there have been some bumps in the road, but they have been mild speed bumps, not car swallowing pot holes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your typical CAD user will quickly voice their complaints about a standard, but rarely praise it.  It&#8217;s the thankless job of CAD management.  Towards the end of last year my company rolled out a new layer standard.  To shed some light on the dynamic of my company, we are divided into sectors (ie residential, site development) and our sectors are then divided into groups.  In all we have some 20-30 different engineering groups in my company.</p>
<p>At the start of our layer standardization process we had some 20 mini-standards.  After some 6-9 months in development, we combined those many standards into 1.  The result has been a roll-out that has been rather successful.  Granted there have been some bumps in the road, but they have been mild speed bumps, not car swallowing pot holes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donnie Gladfelter</title>
		<link>http://thecadgeek.com/blog/2007/10/starting-a-cad-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-3832</link>
		<dc:creator>Donnie Gladfelter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 20:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecadgeek.com/blog/2007/10/28/starting-a-cad-standard/#comment-3832</guid>
		<description>Your typical CAD user will quickly voice their complaints about a standard, but rarely praise it.  It&#039;s the thankless job of CAD management.  Towards the end of last year my company rolled out a new layer standard.  To shed some light on the dynamic of my company, we are divided into sectors (ie residential, site development) and our sectors are then divided into groups.  In all we have some 20-30 different engineering groups in my company.

At the start of our layer standardization process we had some 20 mini-standards.  After some 6-9 months in development, we combined those many standards into 1.  The result has been a roll-out that has been rather successful.  Granted there have been some bumps in the road, but they have been mild speed bumps, not car swallowing pot holes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your typical CAD user will quickly voice their complaints about a standard, but rarely praise it.  It&#8217;s the thankless job of CAD management.  Towards the end of last year my company rolled out a new layer standard.  To shed some light on the dynamic of my company, we are divided into sectors (ie residential, site development) and our sectors are then divided into groups.  In all we have some 20-30 different engineering groups in my company.</p>
<p>At the start of our layer standardization process we had some 20 mini-standards.  After some 6-9 months in development, we combined those many standards into 1.  The result has been a roll-out that has been rather successful.  Granted there have been some bumps in the road, but they have been mild speed bumps, not car swallowing pot holes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aug the Murauder   PIA</title>
		<link>http://thecadgeek.com/blog/2007/10/starting-a-cad-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-975</link>
		<dc:creator>Aug the Murauder   PIA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 20:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecadgeek.com/blog/2007/10/28/starting-a-cad-standard/#comment-975</guid>
		<description>Donnie,
Your points are all well taken. The is a storm on the horizon in the basics of Cad Standards as the wolrd migrates into 3D. Layer conventions no longer make sense or apply. Internal design standards become much more important. Company file management standards and standard library maintenance become larger thasn life. During the transision to 3D the resistance to change will make the up front development of a new standard that much more important.
Of all factors the issue of file management and standard part libraries (or lack there of) will be a whole new arena needing forethought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Donnie,<br />
Your points are all well taken. The is a storm on the horizon in the basics of Cad Standards as the wolrd migrates into 3D. Layer conventions no longer make sense or apply. Internal design standards become much more important. Company file management standards and standard library maintenance become larger thasn life. During the transision to 3D the resistance to change will make the up front development of a new standard that much more important.<br />
Of all factors the issue of file management and standard part libraries (or lack there of) will be a whole new arena needing forethought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aug the Murauder PIA</title>
		<link>http://thecadgeek.com/blog/2007/10/starting-a-cad-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-3831</link>
		<dc:creator>Aug the Murauder PIA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 20:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecadgeek.com/blog/2007/10/28/starting-a-cad-standard/#comment-3831</guid>
		<description>Donnie,
Your points are all well taken. The is a storm on the horizon in the basics of Cad Standards as the wolrd migrates into 3D. Layer conventions no longer make sense or apply. Internal design standards become much more important. Company file management standards and standard library maintenance become larger thasn life. During the transision to 3D the resistance to change will make the up front development of a new standard that much more important.
Of all factors the issue of file management and standard part libraries (or lack there of) will be a whole new arena needing forethought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Donnie,<br />
Your points are all well taken. The is a storm on the horizon in the basics of Cad Standards as the wolrd migrates into 3D. Layer conventions no longer make sense or apply. Internal design standards become much more important. Company file management standards and standard library maintenance become larger thasn life. During the transision to 3D the resistance to change will make the up front development of a new standard that much more important.<br />
Of all factors the issue of file management and standard part libraries (or lack there of) will be a whole new arena needing forethought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AU 2007 - The Training Trinity</title>
		<link>http://thecadgeek.com/blog/2007/10/starting-a-cad-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-339</link>
		<dc:creator>AU 2007 - The Training Trinity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 11:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecadgeek.com/blog/2007/10/28/starting-a-cad-standard/#comment-339</guid>
		<description>[...] a month ago I made a post centered on &#8220;Starting a CAD Standard&#8220;.&#160; I&#8217;ll paraphrase for those of you who may not have read that post.&#160; My [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a month ago I made a post centered on &#8220;Starting a CAD Standard&#8220;.&nbsp; I&#8217;ll paraphrase for those of you who may not have read that post.&nbsp; My [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dermot</title>
		<link>http://thecadgeek.com/blog/2007/10/starting-a-cad-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-330</link>
		<dc:creator>Dermot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 00:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecadgeek.com/blog/2007/10/28/starting-a-cad-standard/#comment-330</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the info Donnie, or should I say the heads up.
I have just been contracting with a company that use Data Cad &amp; the boss (3 man company) wanted me to not spend much time, (&quot;a couple of hrs at the most&quot;) on setting up a cad standard for me working with ACA to look like their DataCad. I got very frustrated &amp; he eventually said that my drafting was too expensive. I am a bit slow drafting but it is not really my forte, I am more of a small project manager/draftsman tah a strait draftsman.
Any how I have to go back to hussling up more of my own work &amp; perfecting/starting a good standard for myself so that I can be more productive.
Can you put me onto any recsources as to how to set up standards for ACA 08
Cheers Dermot (Australia)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the info Donnie, or should I say the heads up.<br />
I have just been contracting with a company that use Data Cad &amp; the boss (3 man company) wanted me to not spend much time, (&#8220;a couple of hrs at the most&#8221;) on setting up a cad standard for me working with ACA to look like their DataCad. I got very frustrated &amp; he eventually said that my drafting was too expensive. I am a bit slow drafting but it is not really my forte, I am more of a small project manager/draftsman tah a strait draftsman.<br />
Any how I have to go back to hussling up more of my own work &amp; perfecting/starting a good standard for myself so that I can be more productive.<br />
Can you put me onto any recsources as to how to set up standards for ACA 08<br />
Cheers Dermot (Australia)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dermot</title>
		<link>http://thecadgeek.com/blog/2007/10/starting-a-cad-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-3830</link>
		<dc:creator>Dermot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 00:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecadgeek.com/blog/2007/10/28/starting-a-cad-standard/#comment-3830</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the info Donnie, or should I say the heads up.
I have just been contracting with a company that use Data Cad &amp; the boss (3 man company) wanted me to not spend much time, (&quot;a couple of hrs at the most&quot;) on setting up a cad standard for me working with ACA to look like their DataCad. I got very frustrated &amp; he eventually said that my drafting was too expensive. I am a bit slow drafting but it is not really my forte, I am more of a small project manager/draftsman tah a strait draftsman.
Any how I have to go back to hussling up more of my own work &amp; perfecting/starting a good standard for myself so that I can be more productive.
Can you put me onto any recsources as to how to set up standards for ACA 08
Cheers Dermot (Australia)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the info Donnie, or should I say the heads up.<br />
I have just been contracting with a company that use Data Cad &amp; the boss (3 man company) wanted me to not spend much time, (&#8220;a couple of hrs at the most&#8221;) on setting up a cad standard for me working with ACA to look like their DataCad. I got very frustrated &amp; he eventually said that my drafting was too expensive. I am a bit slow drafting but it is not really my forte, I am more of a small project manager/draftsman tah a strait draftsman.<br />
Any how I have to go back to hussling up more of my own work &amp; perfecting/starting a good standard for myself so that I can be more productive.<br />
Can you put me onto any recsources as to how to set up standards for ACA 08<br />
Cheers Dermot (Australia)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jose Guia at cadkicks.com</title>
		<link>http://thecadgeek.com/blog/2007/10/starting-a-cad-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-320</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose Guia at cadkicks.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 19:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecadgeek.com/blog/2007/10/28/starting-a-cad-standard/#comment-320</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ve been kicked (a good thing) - Trackback from CadKicks.com
http://www.cadkicks.com/adkautocad/Starting_a_CAD_Standard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve been kicked (a good thing) &#8211; Trackback from CadKicks.com<br />
<a href="http://www.cadkicks.com/adkautocad/Starting_a_CAD_Standard" rel="nofollow">http://www.cadkicks.com/adkautocad/Starting_a_CAD_Standard</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jose Guia at cadkicks.com</title>
		<link>http://thecadgeek.com/blog/2007/10/starting-a-cad-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-3829</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose Guia at cadkicks.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 19:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecadgeek.com/blog/2007/10/28/starting-a-cad-standard/#comment-3829</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ve been kicked (a good thing) - Trackback from CadKicks.com
http://www.cadkicks.com/adkautocad/Starting_a_CAD_Standard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve been kicked (a good thing) &#8211; Trackback from CadKicks.com<br />
<a href="http://www.cadkicks.com/adkautocad/Starting_a_CAD_Standard" rel="nofollow">http://www.cadkicks.com/adkautocad/Starting_a_CAD_Standard</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

