<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cycle through your layout tabs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thecadgeek.com/blog/2006/01/cyclt-through-your-layout-tabs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thecadgeek.com/blog/2006/01/cyclt-through-your-layout-tabs/</link>
	<description>By: Donnie Gladfelter</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:42:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donnie Gladfelter</title>
		<link>http://thecadgeek.com/blog/2006/01/cyclt-through-your-layout-tabs/comment-page-1/#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator>Donnie Gladfelter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 16:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecadgeek.com/blog/?p=18#comment-119</guid>
		<description>Radish â€“ Autodesk AutoCAD and Bentley Microstation  are generally seen as the defacto standards when it comes to CAD.  Truth be known, more and more people are moving towards more specialized packages known as â€œvertical packagesâ€.  Most of my knowledge revolves around Autodesk products.  5-10 years ago AutoCAD (likely running Mechanical Desktop from Softdesk - who Autodesk later bought) was still a prominent contender for machine design.  These days it seems many machine design outfits have evolved towards Autodesk Inventor or SolidWorks.  I used the first version of SolidWorks 98 before Inventor existed, and it truly revolutionized the way machines could be designed and drafted.  

Although AutoCAD has many design tools (largely thanks to the various vertical products such as Civil 3D), it is largely a glorified drafting board.  Ignoring vertical products, many of the drafting procedures in AutoCAD are very reminiscent to the way drafters once drew things using a drafting board.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Radish â€“ Autodesk AutoCAD and Bentley Microstation  are generally seen as the defacto standards when it comes to CAD.  Truth be known, more and more people are moving towards more specialized packages known as â€œvertical packagesâ€.  Most of my knowledge revolves around Autodesk products.  5-10 years ago AutoCAD (likely running Mechanical Desktop from Softdesk &#8211; who Autodesk later bought) was still a prominent contender for machine design.  These days it seems many machine design outfits have evolved towards Autodesk Inventor or SolidWorks.  I used the first version of SolidWorks 98 before Inventor existed, and it truly revolutionized the way machines could be designed and drafted.  </p>
<p>Although AutoCAD has many design tools (largely thanks to the various vertical products such as Civil 3D), it is largely a glorified drafting board.  Ignoring vertical products, many of the drafting procedures in AutoCAD are very reminiscent to the way drafters once drew things using a drafting board.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donnie Gladfelter</title>
		<link>http://thecadgeek.com/blog/2006/01/cyclt-through-your-layout-tabs/comment-page-1/#comment-3539</link>
		<dc:creator>Donnie Gladfelter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 16:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecadgeek.com/blog/?p=18#comment-3539</guid>
		<description>Radish â€“ Autodesk AutoCAD and Bentley Microstation  are generally seen as the defacto standards when it comes to CAD.  Truth be known, more and more people are moving towards more specialized packages known as â€œvertical packagesâ€.  Most of my knowledge revolves around Autodesk products.  5-10 years ago AutoCAD (likely running Mechanical Desktop from Softdesk - who Autodesk later bought) was still a prominent contender for machine design.  These days it seems many machine design outfits have evolved towards Autodesk Inventor or SolidWorks.  I used the first version of SolidWorks 98 before Inventor existed, and it truly revolutionized the way machines could be designed and drafted.  

Although AutoCAD has many design tools (largely thanks to the various vertical products such as Civil 3D), it is largely a glorified drafting board.  Ignoring vertical products, many of the drafting procedures in AutoCAD are very reminiscent to the way drafters once drew things using a drafting board.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Radish â€“ Autodesk AutoCAD and Bentley Microstation  are generally seen as the defacto standards when it comes to CAD.  Truth be known, more and more people are moving towards more specialized packages known as â€œvertical packagesâ€.  Most of my knowledge revolves around Autodesk products.  5-10 years ago AutoCAD (likely running Mechanical Desktop from Softdesk &#8211; who Autodesk later bought) was still a prominent contender for machine design.  These days it seems many machine design outfits have evolved towards Autodesk Inventor or SolidWorks.  I used the first version of SolidWorks 98 before Inventor existed, and it truly revolutionized the way machines could be designed and drafted.  </p>
<p>Although AutoCAD has many design tools (largely thanks to the various vertical products such as Civil 3D), it is largely a glorified drafting board.  Ignoring vertical products, many of the drafting procedures in AutoCAD are very reminiscent to the way drafters once drew things using a drafting board.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Radish G</title>
		<link>http://thecadgeek.com/blog/2006/01/cyclt-through-your-layout-tabs/comment-page-1/#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator>Radish G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 02:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecadgeek.com/blog/?p=18#comment-117</guid>
		<description>Dear Sir,
 My name is Radish G i am from india. Now i a working as a paper machine design engineer. I frequently seeing your blog its all very nice and use full to me, and i have lot of doubt in AutoCAD, i asked to lot of peoples but nobody was not ready to answer my question, so if i ask to you, are u able to help me anyhow as u wish, please if u convenient to help me please replay me ok thank you Wish u all the best</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Sir,<br />
 My name is Radish G i am from india. Now i a working as a paper machine design engineer. I frequently seeing your blog its all very nice and use full to me, and i have lot of doubt in AutoCAD, i asked to lot of peoples but nobody was not ready to answer my question, so if i ask to you, are u able to help me anyhow as u wish, please if u convenient to help me please replay me ok thank you Wish u all the best</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Radish G</title>
		<link>http://thecadgeek.com/blog/2006/01/cyclt-through-your-layout-tabs/comment-page-1/#comment-3538</link>
		<dc:creator>Radish G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 02:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecadgeek.com/blog/?p=18#comment-3538</guid>
		<description>Dear Sir,
 My name is Radish G i am from india. Now i a working as a paper machine design engineer. I frequently seeing your blog its all very nice and use full to me, and i have lot of doubt in AutoCAD, i asked to lot of peoples but nobody was not ready to answer my question, so if i ask to you, are u able to help me anyhow as u wish, please if u convenient to help me please replay me ok thank you Wish u all the best</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Sir,<br />
 My name is Radish G i am from india. Now i a working as a paper machine design engineer. I frequently seeing your blog its all very nice and use full to me, and i have lot of doubt in AutoCAD, i asked to lot of peoples but nobody was not ready to answer my question, so if i ask to you, are u able to help me anyhow as u wish, please if u convenient to help me please replay me ok thank you Wish u all the best</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

